create_notebook

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It describes the action but does not disclose permissions, side effects, or behavior on invalid parent_id. It is minimal beyond the basic create operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences front-loaded with the action, followed by an Args list. The Args list is somewhat repetitive with the schema but adds minimal value; still concise overall.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple 2-param create operation with output schema, the description adequately covers purpose and parameters, but lacks explicit guidance on when to use alternatives or error handling.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema coverage, the description explains the purpose of each parameter beyond the schema: 'title: Notebook title' and 'parent_id: Parent notebook (folder) id to nest under, if any.' The example clarifies the nesting behavior.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Create a new notebook (folder)' with a specific verb and resource, and adds the nesting use case ('Use parent_id to nest it under an existing notebook, e.g. a client/project notebook'). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like create_note and update_notebook.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explains how to nest under an existing notebook with parent_id and gives an example. However, it doesn't explicitly contrast with alternatives or state when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.