Skip to main content
Glama
binodrajpandey

MCP Server Example

by binodrajpandey
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Server Example

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Demo-MCP

      Modemsmoker
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A minimal Model Context Protocol server exposing arithmetic, time, and note-taking tools over streamable HTTP, with in-memory state and Docker support.
      -

    • tavily-server

      dkmaker
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that implements a simple notes system with resources for notes, a tool to create notes, and prompts to summarize notes.
      1
      -

    • MCP Server Basic Example

      harishivam1411
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A demonstration implementation of a Model Context Protocol server that provides simple mathematical tools (add, subtract) and personalized greeting resources.
      -

    • MCP Server Demo

      bollam1818
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      A demonstration MCP server that provides calculator tools for arithmetic operations, personalized greeting resources, and code review prompt templates. Enables users to perform basic math calculations, generate dynamic greetings, and access reusable code review templates through the Model Context Protocol.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.6/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    The tools fall into two unrelated domains (arithmetic and note management) with no overlap within each domain, but the set as a whole is confusing because add/multiply and delete_note/save_note serve completely different purposes. An agent might struggle to understand why these tools are grouped together, though individual tools are distinct.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    Naming is inconsistent across the set: add and multiply use simple verbs without objects, while delete_note and save_note follow a verb_noun pattern. This mixed convention lacks a predictable pattern, making the tool set harder to navigate.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 4 tools, the count is reasonable for a small server, but it feels thin and poorly scoped because it covers two unrelated domains. For either arithmetic or note management alone, 4 tools would be appropriate, but combined, it suggests an incomplete or mismatched purpose.

    Completeness2/5

    For arithmetic, basic operations like subtraction and division are missing, leaving gaps. For note management, there's no way to list or retrieve notes, creating dead ends. The server lacks a clear domain, making completeness hard to assess, but obvious gaps exist in both inferred areas.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources