Skip to main content
Glama
bind-protocol

@bind-protocol/mcp-server

Official
by bind-protocol
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to @bind-protocol/mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • aip-identity

      The-Nexus-Guard
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for AI agent identity — verify agents with Ed25519 signatures, check trust scores, sign and verify content, exchange encrypted messages. Built on the Agent Identity Protocol (AIP).
      8
      MIT

    • agent-guardrail

      rudimentall1
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for AI agent guardrails — validates and signs agent decisions (OAA tokens) so third parties can verify them without server access
      3
      1
      MIT

    • fallengineer-us-mcp

      sjgant80-hub
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A sovereign, MIT-licensed MCP server for professional-service workflow tools that runs on your infrastructure with Ed25519 signing, enabling autonomous agents to discover and invoke tools securely.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool serves a distinct purpose: bind_verify_credential performs full signature verification, bind_hash_credential computes a hash for revocation lookup, and bind_parse_credential decodes without verification. There is no overlap or ambiguity between these actions.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent 'bind_verb_noun' pattern: bind_verify_credential, bind_hash_credential, bind_parse_credential. The prefix and verb ordering are uniform, making the set predictable and easy to navigate.

    Tool Count5/5

    The server has only 3 tools, each focused on a specific credential operation (verify, hash, parse). This is a well-scoped set for a credential utility, falling within the typical 3-15 tool range and avoiding redundancy.

    Completeness3/5

    The tools cover parsing, hashing, and verification, but verification explicitly does not check revocation and relies on a separate 'bind_check_revocation' tool that is not included. This creates a notable gap in the credential validation workflow, as the hash tool is only useful if the revocation check is available elsewhere.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources