Retrieve a specific Aptabase application's details by providing its app ID, enabling direct access to configuration and analytics for that app.
Get a single Aptabase app by id.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| appId | Yes | Aptabase app id |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.0.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits such as read-only nature, error handling, or authentication requirements. A simple 'Get' does not add meaningful transparency beyond the tool's name.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, focused sentence with no filler. It is appropriately concise for a simple single-parameter get operation.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple read operation with full schema coverage, the description is adequate. It does not explain return values, but no output schema exists; the lack of annotations is partially mitigated by the obvious read-only nature of a 'get by id'.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with the parameter described as 'Aptabase app id'. The description's 'by id' adds little beyond the schema, so it meets the baseline without enriching parameter meaning.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Get'), the resource ('a single Aptabase app'), and the distinguishing qualifier ('by id'), which separates it from list_apps and other get_* tools.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The usage context is implied by 'single' and 'by id', but there is no explicit mention of when to use this tool versus list_apps or other alternatives. The agent must infer that this is for one specific app.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.