Skip to main content
Glama
bill-gtl-group

File Server MCP

by bill-gtl-group
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to File Server MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • filesystem_mcp_server

      RAJPUTDEE
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables LLM agents and MCP clients to read, list, write, search, watch, and batch-process files within configured allowed directories, while exposing discoverable file resources and structured error codes.
      -

    • mcp-chatgpt-file-store

      tanongkiat
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables saving and managing files in a sandboxed local folder via MCP, with tools for listing, reading, writing, appending, searching, moving, and deleting files and directories.
      10
      -

    • LocalFiles MCP Server

      AliceLynxx
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides secure access to local files from specified directories. Enables listing files, reading contents, and configurable file size and extension filtering.
      1
      MIT

    • MCP Filesystem Server

      AndrxsQ
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables file system operations such as listing directories, reading, writing, creating, and deleting files or directories through MCP.
      10 npm
      MIT

    • Filesystem MCP Server

      eeb16027
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides secure filesystem operations, including reading, searching, and batch processing files, with directory monitoring to detect new files, designed for integration with MCP clients such as LangGraph agents.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct operation: listing directory entries, reading one file's content, and searching for files by text. There is little risk of an agent selecting the wrong tool.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All three tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (list_files, read_file, search_files). The singular/plural noun forms are conventional and do not create ambiguity.

    Tool Count4/5

    Three tools is minimal but reasonable for a narrowly scoped read-only file access server. It is slightly lean, but every tool covers a distinct and useful operation.

    Completeness2/5

    Despite the 'File Server' name, there are no create, write, update, move, or delete operations, leaving file modification workflows impossible. Agents can only read and search, so the surface is notably incomplete for general file management.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources