Where My Hug At?
Related Servers
Alternatives to Where My Hug At?
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceOdds are, most of what you want to build is already open source. Tell your AI agent what you're making, and it finds it: which repos to use as they are, which to adapt, and what's left for you to write. Every repo it names is real, licensed for your use or flagged, and checked live.3124 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenancethicken turns photos of a real object into a GLB model at its real size and its metadata as JSON, read off the object by vision models and looked up in public catalogs. What it knows about each kind of object lives in a profile: a few come with thicken, and you can add your own.2147 npm1MIT
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to search, compare, and right-size Hugging Face models, including estimating whether a model fits in available GPU VRAM before downloading it.5MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables users to scan Hugging Face for Apple-MLX models, estimate memory fit and decode speed for their Mac, and get ranked recommendations for a use case, with all agent work running locally.112MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to discover, compare, and select the best AI models across multiple providers based on pricing, performance, and capabilities, with real-time cost estimation and benchmarking.93,909 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables plain-English description of training data needs to search Hugging Face and GitHub, composing coverage-scored training packs without API keys or Bridge.584 npm1Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceDiscovers LLM models in real time from cloud providers and local Ollama instances, returning compatibility profiles and live pricing so AI agents can route tasks to the cheapest viable model without breaking tool calls or context clipping.10MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables users to describe an LLM fine-tuning job in natural language and receive ranked GPU recommendations from a dozen cloud providers, based on estimated VRAM and FLOPs requirements. It surfaces the cheapest, fastest, and most balanced hardware options while disclosing the source and freshness of each price.-
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
The three tools are explicitly numbered as steps 1, 2, and 3 of a single pipeline, each with a clearly bounded role (intake, search, verify). There is no realistic way for an agent to confuse gathering answers with searching hubs or verifying picks.
All three names share the where_my_hug prefix and use predictable suffixes (base, _search, _verify) in snake_case. The entry tool lacks a verb-like suffix, a minor deviation, but the pattern remains obvious and readable.
Three tools map exactly onto the three phases of a linear recommendation workflow, with each step earning its place. This is well-scoped and avoids fragmenting the pipeline into unnecessary tools.
The surface covers the full lifecycle of the stated purpose: clarifying questions, multi-hub search, and live verification with actionable nextAction branching. Since it is an advisory read-only workflow, no create/update/delete operations are needed, leaving only minor gaps like no explicit restart/cleanup tool.