Most tools map cleanly to distinct lifecycle actions: create, update, correct, retract, unpublish, republish, and feed/validation operations are well separated. The main ambiguity is between correct_entry and update_entry, since both modify an entry while preserving its identity; the correction framing helps but could overlap for simple edits.

All tools follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern with clear verbs such as get, list, create, update, validate, audit, and rebuild. Even specialized actions like correct_entry, retract_entry, unpublish_entry, and republish_entry use the same convention, making the set predictable.

Sixteen tools is slightly above the usual sweet spot, but each covers a distinct facet of running an RSS publisher: configuration, entry lifecycle, corrections/retractions, validation/audit, rebuild, batching, and assets. It is not bloated, though a few tools like find_similar_active_entries add extra surface beyond a minimal CRUD set.

The entry lifecycle is well covered with create, read, update, unpublish, republish, correct, retract, and batch publish, plus feed configuration, validation/audit, and rebuild. Minor gaps exist around asset management since only get_asset is exposed and binary upload is handled outside the MCP server; there is also no explicit physical delete, though retract/unpublish appear to be intentional immutable alternatives.