Skip to main content
Glama
bhouston

mcp-server-text-editor

by bhouston
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-server-text-editor

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-text-editor

      tumf
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A line-oriented text file editor. Optimized for LLM tools with efficient partial file access to minimize token usage.
      6
      201
      MIT

    • MCP Text Editor Server

      fastmcp-me
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides line-oriented text file editing capabilities through a standardized API. Optimized for LLM tools with efficient partial file access to minimize token usage.
      MIT

    • a0

      Joe-Simo
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to open, edit, check, run, emit, and save source programs through structured, revision-checked tools over stdio, confining paths to the launch root and returning diagnostics with fixes for rejected edits.
      1 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlap between tools. The tool has a single, clear purpose for file editing with persistent state, making disambiguation trivial.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    A single tool named 'text_editor' follows a clear and consistent naming pattern. There are no other tools to compare against, so no inconsistency can exist.

    Tool Count2/5

    A single tool for a text editor server feels thin and under-scoped. While it covers basic file operations, typical text editors would benefit from additional tools for tasks like search/replace, formatting, or managing multiple files, making this count borderline inadequate.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool surface is severely incomplete for a text editor domain. It lacks essential operations such as search within files, undo/redo functionality, file management (e.g., rename, delete), or formatting options, which are core to text editing workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources