close_card
Deactivate a card by providing its ID to stop further transactions and enforce spend policies.
Instructions
Deactivate a card.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| card_id | Yes |
Deactivate a card by providing its ID to stop further transactions and enforce spend policies.
Deactivate a card.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| card_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description minimally says 'deactivate' but fails to disclose whether the action is reversible, requires special permissions, or affects other cards.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise (two words) and front-loaded, but could be slightly more informative without sacrificing brevity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a mutation tool with no output schema and no annotations, the description is incomplete—it omits return value, side effects, and additional context needed for correct invocation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description adds no meaning to 'card_id' beyond its type, leaving the agent guessing about format or how to obtain it.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Deactivate a card' uses a specific verb and resource, clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools like list_cards, create_card, and get_card_details.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to deactivate a card versus other actions, nor any prerequisites or consequences mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/bhavyam2/sentinel'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server