Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Flick

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to delegate complex web browsing goals to a real Chrome instance driven by Jev, completing tasks end-to-end in ~300ms per decision and returning only the final result.
      11
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Lets any MCP agent control your signed-in Chrome with full login state, offering normal browser tools and an optional Fast JEV mode for bounded-speed typed decisions on the same profile.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to delegate browser exploration to Jev by providing natural-language objectives, receiving compact evidence and source context, and continuing the same live browser session through supervisor handoffs.
      6
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables plain-English browser automation via an MCP server, allowing agents to run objectives or test suites in a real browser without selectors or scripts.
      63 npm
      2
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Gives AI agents and MCP clients direct control over native desktop apps, Chrome/Electron browsers, and Android devices with screenshots, OCR, accessibility-based element lookup, input simulation, window management, CDP, and ADB in one local server.
      133
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 15 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Multiple tools start automation tasks (computer_run, computer_execute, computer_workflow) with subtle differences that are difficult to distinguish, and computer_inspect/computer_status with includeObservation both return interface state. computer_screenshot and computer_copy_image also overlap in image capture, so boundaries between tools are not always clear.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All tools share the consistent 'computer_' prefix, but suffixes mix nouns (health, sessions, apps, status, workflow, screenshot) and verbs (open, inspect, act, run, execute, continue, cancel, close). This is readable and predictable at the prefix level, but it lacks a uniform verb_noun convention.

    Tool Count4/5

    At 15 tools, the set sits at the upper edge of the typical well-scoped range, and the broad computer-automation domain justifies much of its size. However, the overlapping task-launching tools could be consolidated without losing coverage.

    Completeness4/5

    The core lifecycle is well covered: open, inspect, act, run, status, cancel, continue, and close, plus support utilities like screenshots, sessions, and app listing. Minor gaps exist, such as lack of fine-grained configuration or session management controls, but common workflows should not hit dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues