update_trigger_status

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds the key behavioral aspect of toggling status, which is not in annotations. However, it does not mention idempotency (already hinted by annotation) or side effects. Adequate but minimal.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise (12 words), front-loads the action, and wastes no words. Every element earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with annotations and output schema, the description covers the basic action and status values. However, it lacks context on what pausing means for trigger executions and expected input formats.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It clarifies acceptable values for 'status' ('active' or 'paused'), but provides no explanation for 'trigger_id'. Incomplete compensation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Pause or resume a trigger,' specifying the verb and resource. It distinguishes the tool from siblings like 'run_trigger' or 'delete_trigger' by focusing on status modification.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as 'run_trigger' or 'create_trigger'. No context about prerequisites or when pausing/resuming is appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.