list_devices
List all available iOS simulators and physical devices for profiling and testing.
Instructions
List available iOS simulators and physical devices.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
List all available iOS simulators and physical devices for profiling and testing.
List available iOS simulators and physical devices.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description is minimal and doesn't disclose behavioral traits beyond listing; with no annotations, agents lack information on side effects, permissions, or whether a device needs to be connected.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, direct, and to the point with no unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the lack of output schema and annotations, the description should provide more context about the returned data (e.g., device names, UDIDs, status) to fully inform an AI agent.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, so the description has little burden; however, it doesn't elaborate on what fields or information the list contains, which would be helpful.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'List' and the resource 'iOS simulators and physical devices', distinguishing it from sibling tools like list_templates which list templates.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool vs alternatives (e.g., list_templates), nor any prerequisites or context for usage.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/bfernandesbfs/ios-instruments-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server