Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to gib-fatura-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for Parasut Turkish accounting platform, enabling management of invoices, contacts, products, e-documents, inventory, and financials via 31 tools.
      8 npm
      9
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for the Invapi E-Invoicing API, enabling conversion, validation, and extraction of invoices in UBL, CII, ZUGFeRD, Excel, and more.
      48 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for Factura.uz electronic invoicing system (Uzbekistan). Supports creating, signing, accepting, and rejecting e-invoices, plus company and product lookups.
      8
      7 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for Italian electronic invoicing via the Invoicetronic API, enabling management of invoices through SDI with 20 tools for sending, receiving, exporting, and more.
      18
      21 PyPI
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for electronic invoicing that enables generating, validating, and parsing Factur-X and ZUGFeRD compliant XML invoices. It supports the French 2026 B2B reform and provides integration with Chorus Pro for automated invoice submission and status tracking.
      9
      17 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for e-invoice platforms. Enables natural language querying of invoices, partners, company data, and financial reports.
      18
      11 npm
      6
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 24 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose covering different aspects of the document lifecycle: authentication, document creation (invoice, producer receipt, self-employed receipt), retrieval, deletion, signing, and dispute management. The use of unique verbs and nouns prevents any ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools consistently use the 'gib_' prefix followed by a verb_noun pattern (e.g., gib_create_invoice, gib_list_documents, gib_get_document). This uniform naming convention makes the API predictable and easy to navigate.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 24 tools, the count is on the higher side but justified by the complexity of the Turkish tax document domain which requires authentication, document creation (multiple types), signing, dispute management, and reference data operations. Each tool serves a distinct and necessary function.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set covers the full lifecycle: authentication, session management, document creation (invoice, producer receipt, self-employed receipt), retrieval, listing, deletion, signing via SMS verification, cancellation, objection, reference data, user profile management, and recipient verification. No obvious gaps are present for the stated purpose of interacting with the GİB e-Arşiv portal.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues