Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to ai-visibility-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to check whether a public website is crawlable, understandable, and ready for AI search workflows through local-only audits of robots.txt, sitemaps, metadata, and llms.txt.
      3
      50 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to audit a website's AI visibility by checking crawler access, identity files, and page signals, and running a full scored audit across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity.
      3
      36 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Check whether a website is visible to AI search engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Google AI Overviews). Returns a 0-100 readiness score, a grade, and a specific fix for each gap. Dependency-free, no API keys.
      2
      8 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Analyze and generate robots.txt files with AI crawler awareness. Fetch any site's robots.txt, detect which AI bots (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Google-Extended) are blocked or allowed, and generate optimized robots.txt with toggle controls for 20+ AI crawlers.
      5
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides AI-visibility scoring and site auditing capabilities for websites, enabling agents to check how sites appear in AI engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity, run full SEO/security audits, and monitor changes over time.
      15
      156 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables auditing AI search visibility: checks site readiness for AI crawlers and measures whether ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity recommend your site, including verbatim answers and citation gap analysis.
      89 npm
      4
      AGPL 3.0

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: audit_ai_visibility performs a comprehensive composite audit, check_ai_bot_access focuses solely on robots.txt and bot access, check_llm_mention checks LLM responses for brand mentions, and compare_competitors runs audits across multiple domains. No two tools overlap in functionality.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: audit_ai_visibility, check_ai_bot_access, check_llm_mention, compare_competitors. The verbs (audit, check, compare) clearly indicate the action, and nouns describe the target.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 4 tools, the server covers its core domain—AI visibility auditing—without being excessive or insufficient. Each tool contributes a distinct operation: detailed audit, specific check, LLM search, and competitive comparison.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface is complete for the domain: it includes a comprehensive audit (robots, sitemap, JSON-LD, llms.txt), a specific robots.txt check, LLM mention analysis, and competitor comparison. No obvious missing operations like per-resource checks are needed, as they are covered by the composite audit.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues