FCEFyN MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to FCEFyN MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to browse your own university courses by downloading files, slides, announcements, deadlines, grades and lecture transcripts to your machine, then answering questions and searching across them through MCP tools. It logs in with your own account and refreshes only what changed.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables users to read Moodle course information, list courses, outlines, resources, assignments, and deadlines, and download or extract text from course files locally via an MCP-compatible client.MIT
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for the Moodle-based Campus Virtual FCEIA UNR, providing tools to read courses, assignments, forums, and grades, plus write operations (posting, grading, messaging, events) with dry-run safety.201-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceLocal read-only MCP server for e-FICH (Moodle FICH-UNL) enabling course content, announcements, calendar events, and PDF search via MCP clients.3MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables browser-based login to approved UTN Moodle sites and read-only access to the user's profile, course list, and course activities via local Chromium automation.2-
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to query the UTN distance learning Moodle campus, providing tools to list courses, view content, check deadlines, see grades, and more.7-
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool targets a distinct step in a browsing workflow: listing courses, dumping a course's structure, searching that structure, and reading a specific item. The main risk is get_course_contents vs search_course_contents, but descriptions clarify that one returns the full visible outline and the other searches name/description fields only. read_content is clearly the terminal action for a specific activity or resource.
All four names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern: list_courses, get_course_contents, read_content, search_course_contents. The verbs are conventional and predictable for the actions they represent, with no mixed conventions or vague names.
Four tools is on the lean side but well-scoped for a read-only LMS browsing server; each tool (list, outline, search, read) earns its place without redundancy. It is slightly thin compared with richer LMS surfaces, but not a mismatch for the stated browsing purpose.
The surface covers the full read-only discovery lifecycle: list enrolled courses, inspect course structure, search the index, and read individual activities/resources with pagination. Minor gaps remain (no user/profile or grade overview, and write actions are explicitly excluded), but core browsing workflows have no dead ends.