Hukuk MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Hukuk MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP-compatible AI clients to research official Turkish legal sources locally by searching judicial decisions, legislation, and Constitutional Court decisions, and by retrieving legal documents, individual articles, and legislation structures.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides programmatic access to Turkey's Ministry of Justice Legislation Information System (mevzuat.gov.tr), enabling users to search legislation, retrieve article hierarchies, and fetch article contents in Markdown format through natural language.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceConnects AI assistants to Brazilian judicial data via DataJud CNJ, LexML, and local corpus, enabling process consultation, legal research, and document generation with Visual Law.261MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn AI-powered legal research tool that enables users to search for and retrieve legal precedents and case law decisions through a Model Context Protocol server. It supports both Turkish and English, providing lawyers and researchers with streamlined access to a comprehensive database of jurisprudence.2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceConnects AI assistants to Brazilian judicial data from DataJud CNJ and 91 courts, enabling process consultation, monitoring, and deadline calculation under the Civil Procedure Code.9102MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides AI assistants with up-to-date legal documents from official sources, enabling accurate legal information retrieval and analysis.18-
TDQS
Scored across 20 tools
Each tool targets a distinct legal source or document operation (search_kurum vs search_aym vs search_emsal vs search_karar, etc.), but the overlapping case-law search tools (search_emsal, search_karar, search_kurum) could occasionally be confused without domain knowledge. Descriptions clarify sources like Yargıtay/Danıştay vs UYAP Emsal vs administrative institutions.
Most tools follow a consistent search_X/get_X pattern in snake_case, but utility tools mix English verbs (check_kaynaklar) with Turkish noun-verb order (udf_yaz, uslup_kaydet) and noun-noun forms (dilekce_taslagi), creating minor inconsistency. Still readable and mostly predictable.
20 tools is slightly above the ideal 3-15 range, but the breadth of legal sources (5 research families) and document operations justifies each tool's presence; no redundant tools. It feels comprehensive rather than bloated.
The surface covers search and full-text retrieval for all major Turkish legal sources, plus document conversion, petition drafting, and style management. Minor gaps: no delete/update for saved style samples, and no within-decision search for case law (only for legislation). These are workable.