discord_mod_edit_channel

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description lists editable fields but does not disclose behavioral traits beyond the schema. For example, it does not mention that changing parentId moves the channel, or that rateLimitPerUser only applies to text channels. With no annotations, the description carries the full burden for transparency, and it falls short.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence that front-loads the action and lists the editable fields. No extraneous information is included.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description is adequate for a simple edit tool, but it lacks context on side effects (e.g., reordering when changing position) and does not clarify that multiple fields can be edited simultaneously (schema permits it, but description uses 'or' which might imply mutually exclusive). No output schema or annotations are present to supplement.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description merely restates the fields without adding new meaning or context beyond what the schema already provides. It does not enhance understanding of parameter semantics.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (edits) and the resource (Discord channel), and lists the editable attributes (name, topic, parent category, position, slowmode). It is a specific verb+resource combination and distinguishes itself from sibling tools like create_channel or delete_channel.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when modifications to a channel are needed, but it lacks explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus other tools (e.g., create_channel, set_permissions) or prerequisites like permissions. No exclusions or alternatives are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.