Skip to main content
Glama

Add a new demo

add_demo
Destructive

Create a new demo entry in Berbotu's vault by committing a Markdown file to GitHub. Requires artist and track; prevents duplicates and returns a commit permalink for audit.

Instructions

Creates a new demo entry in the Berbotu vault by committing a Markdown file to the berbotu/vault GitHub repo (path: 00 Releases/Demos/{ARTIST} - {TITLE}.md). Use this when the user wants to log a fresh submission — e.g. 'add a demo from RULACID called UNTITLED', or 'log a new demo from the email I just pasted'. REQUIRED: artist + track. Both must be non-empty strings. OPTIONAL: stage (default 'Listening'), received_date (default today UTC), notes (default empty). Refuses to overwrite if a demo with the same artist+title already exists — in that case the user should edit via admin.berbotu.com instead. On success returns the created file path, the full frontmatter that was written, and a permalink to the GitHub commit so the user can audit the change.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
notesNoFree-text notes for the demo card — short context like 'sent via IG DM' or 'recommended by GADDAM'.
stageNoInitial stage. Defaults to 'Listening' (the inbox state). Other values flow: Listening → Review → Interested → Hold → Pass → Converted.
trackYesTrack title. Use 'UNTITLED' if the producer didn't name it.
artistYesArtist or producer alias. Use the same spelling/case the user provided — the vault convention is ALL CAPS but we do not force-uppercase here. For collabs use 'A & B' as a single string.
received_dateNoDate the demo was received (YYYY-MM-DD, UTC). Defaults to today.
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses important side effects beyond the annotations: it commits a Markdown file to a GitHub repo, refuses to overwrite existing demos, and returns a GitHub commit permalink. This adds meaningful behavioral context, especially clarifying that the destructiveHint=true annotation does not imply overwriting existing data.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is information-dense with no filler. Each sentence serves a distinct purpose: defining the action and repo path, giving use-case examples, listing requirements/defaults, explaining conflict handling, and describing return values.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with 5 parameters and no output schema, the description covers all necessary context: trigger, constraints, defaults, conflict behavior, side effects, and return values. It fully prepares an agent to invoke the tool correctly and interpret the result.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already provides 100% description coverage for all 5 parameters with detailed semantics, so the baseline is 3. The description mostly restates the required/optional fields and defaults, adding only the path formula (artist + title) but no substantially new parameter meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Creates'), a concrete resource ('Berbotu vault by committing a Markdown file'), and an exact repository path, making the tool's purpose unmistakable. It clearly distinguishes this tool from the sibling read/list tools (ping, list_demos, list_releases).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly states when to use the tool: 'Use this when the user wants to log a fresh submission', with concrete examples. It also provides a when-not-to-use alternative: if a demo already exists, the user should edit via admin.berbotu.com instead, since this tool refuses to overwrite.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/berbotu/berbotu-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server