Skip to main content
Glama
bennyp11

BytesJev PlanningChecker

by bennyp11
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to BytesJev PlanningChecker

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Worth Sending by wudpecker

      Worth Sendingofficial

      wudpecker
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to evaluate whether a product-adoption message is worth sending by applying a fixed, evidence-based rubric to a draft, recipient context, evidence, and the agent's own assessment, returning a send, revise, or hold recommendation with a score and reasons.
      2
      MIT

    • gitworthy

      trippyogi
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to scout, rank, and preflight software work before implementation, returning evidence-backed ACT, VERIFY, or SKIP decisions for issues and pull requests.
      38 npm
      2
      MIT

    • python-e18e MCP

      python-e18e
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to review Python dependency requirements and source code against a modernization catalog, returning structured guidance, import-level suggestions, and compatibility floors. It also lists available codemod recipes and previews their transformations as unified diffs, all read-only and without installing packages or executing supplied code.
      MIT

    • BlindReview MCP

      Magnifico4625
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to get one independent reviewer that first reasons about a problem without seeing the proposed solution, then compares it against the revealed proposal and returns a compact verdict (KEEP/MODIFY/REPLACE/INSUFFICIENT_EVIDENCE) with risks, an alternative, and a falsification probe before committing to expensive decisions.
      3
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A4.5/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or misselection between tools. The tool's purpose is clearly distinct by default.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    A single tool named 'PlanningChecker' follows a consistent naming pattern by itself. There are no other tools to create inconsistency, so the naming is perfectly consistent within the set.

    Tool Count4/5

    The server's purpose is a single advisory check, so one tool is appropriate and well-scoped. It is slightly below the typical 3-15 range, but the narrow focus justifies the minimal surface.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool covers the full stated purpose of checking a plan for overengineering, with no obvious missing operations for an advisory service. Minor gaps like history or batch processing are not required for its core function.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources