Skip to main content
Glama
benjimkh

github-mcp-lite

by benjimkh
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to github-mcp-lite

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-github

      nhevers
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for GitHub operations, providing tools for repository management, issues, pull requests, and code search.
      -

    • GitHub Prod MCP

      nouhailadahmany
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A production-ready MCP server for GitHub operations, providing tools for repository management, issues, pull requests, and more via both MCP stdio and REST API.
      27
      MIT

    • github-mcp-lite

      MatinMHF
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A minimal MCP server that enables creating GitHub repositories, committing files, and publishing releases using just a personal access token, without Docker or local Git.
      2
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: issues, pull requests, repos, files, and search. No overlap in functionality; e.g., list_issues vs list_pull_requests are clearly separated.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., create_issue, get_repo, search_code), making it predictable for an agent.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 9 tools, the server is well-scoped for a 'lite' GitHub MCP, covering essential operations without being bloated or too sparse.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool set covers read operations extensively (get, list, search) and create for issues, but lacks update/delete for issues and PR creation/update, which are notable gaps for common workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources