dandi-query-server
Related Servers
Alternatives to dandi-query-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables creating, managing, and searching Markdown notes with support for tags, timestamps, and full-text search. Includes AI prompts for analyzing and summarizing notes.61MIT
- FlicenseCqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables creating and managing text notes with a simple note-taking system. Provides tools to create notes, access them via URIs, and generate summaries of all stored notes.41 npm-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables creating, accessing, and summarizing text notes via URI resources and tools.14 npm-
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables indexing and retrieving notes with full-text search using SQLite, plus building knowledge graphs to find relationships between concepts. Supports natural language note management, tagging, and semantic connections.16-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceFacilitates note storage and summarization through custom URIs, allowing users to manage, summarize, and update notes with varying detail levels in a collaborative environment.-
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage a personal markdown-based knowledge base with natural language interactions. Supports creating, searching, updating, and organizing notes across categories like people, recipes, meetings, and procedures.111-
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes, but `get_schema` and `get_full_schema` overlap significantly. The descriptions differ in wording but not in clear behavioral distinction, which could confuse an agent.
All tool names follow a consistent `verb_noun` pattern (e.g., `execute_sql`, `search_datasets`). Even `get_full_schema` adheres to this pattern with an adjective inserted. No mixing of conventions.
Seven tools cover querying, schema exploration, and validation. This is a well-scoped set for a database query server—enough tools to be useful without overwhelming the user.
The tool set covers core query, schema, and search needs. Missing conveniences like direct single-resource lookup by ID, but SQL can compensate. Minor gap in not having a tool for retrieving specific dataset details without SQL.