YouTube MCP Server
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| YOUTUBE_API_KEY | Yes | Your YouTube Data API v3 key from Google Cloud Console |
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": false
} |
| experimental | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| search_youtube_videosB | |
| get_youtube_transcriptB | |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have completely distinct purposes: one retrieves transcripts for specific videos, while the other searches for videos based on queries. There is no overlap in functionality, making it impossible for an agent to confuse them.
Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with clear, descriptive names: get_youtube_transcript and search_youtube_videos. The naming convention is uniform and predictable throughout the set.
With only two tools, this server feels severely underpowered for YouTube integration. Key operations like uploading videos, managing playlists, getting video details, or interacting with comments are missing, making the surface too thin for meaningful YouTube automation.
The toolset is highly incomplete for a YouTube server. While transcript fetching and video search are useful, there are major gaps: no CRUD operations for videos/channels/playlists, no interaction capabilities (likes/comments), and no metadata retrieval beyond search results. This will cause significant agent failures in typical YouTube workflows.