Skip to main content
Glama
beiming183-cloud

AutoCAD MCP Server - Codex Edition

Related Servers

Alternatives to AutoCAD MCP Server - Codex Edition

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for AutoCAD LT automation and headless DXF generation, exposing tools for drawing, entities, layers, blocks, annotations, P&ID, and view operations via natural language.
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables natural-language control of AutoCAD via file IPC or headless DXF generation, with tools for drawing, entities, layers, blocks, annotations, P&ID, views, and system operations.
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to create and edit technical drawings, manage layers and geometry, process GIS/research mapping data, generate previews and layouts, and automate AutoCAD documents on Windows through COM.
      225
      65 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      FastMCP server for automating AutoCAD via COM on Windows, enabling drawing creation, entity drawing, and drawing management through natural language commands.
      46
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables natural-language control of AutoCAD LT for automation and headless DXF generation, supporting drawing, entity, layer, block, annotation, P&ID, and system operations via an MCP interface.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Natural-language MCP bridge for AutoCAD 2024. Enables users to inspect and edit DWG drawings, manage layers, entities, layouts, styles, and system variables; draw 2D geometry and 3D solids; perform measurements and transactional edits; and export to DWG, STL, PDF, DWF, SVG, or raster formats through a local named-pipe connection.
      21
      1
      -

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tools are organized by domain (product, drawing, entity, layer, etc.), which gives each a distinct purpose. However, there is some overlap: product.fillet_edges and solid.fillet_edges ostensibly do the same thing, and drawing.render_preview vs view.get_screenshot both produce visual output, which could confuse an agent.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Top-level tool names are all single nouns (product, drawing, entity, etc.), an internally consistent pattern. Sub-operation names, however, vary without a strict convention: some are verb_noun (create_line, set_properties), others are bare verbs (list, move), and some are noun phrases (capabilities, review_summary). The grouping helps, but the overall pattern is not uniform.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 12 top-level tools, each covering a distinct aspect of CAD automation, the count is well within the 3-15 ideal range. Although each tool exposes many sub-operations, the top-level granularity keeps the surface manageable and scoped appropriately for the domain.

    Completeness4/5

    The set provides broad coverage: drawing file lifecycle, entity CRUD, layers, blocks, annotations, 3D solids, P&ID symbols, transactions, view management, and system health. Some niche operations (e.g., fillet_edges) are stubbed with capability errors, and advanced selection or dimension editing might be missing, but the core workflows are represented.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues