Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Groundcheck

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Enables smart-money whale and market analytics for Polymarket, including leaderboards, wallet profiles, positions, market clusters, and alerts, through Claude Desktop and other MCP clients.
    6
    124 PyPI
    1
    MIT

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables agents and clients to fact-check factual claims against live web sources, returning citable verdicts with source details and cryptographically signed receipts for downstream verification.
    1
    40 npm
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables agents to verify their own output mid-task by checking every claim against provided sources, returning supported, partial, unsupported, or contradicted verdicts with exact citations.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables agents and users to extract factual claims from text, URLs, files, or AI answers and judge each against live web sources with confidence, evidence, and citations. It also integrates with MCP-capable clients so claims can be checked before an answer is shown.
    288 npm
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    F
    maintenance
    Verifies claims with verdicts (supported/disputed/unverifiable), confidence scores, and cited sources by cross-referencing FoundryNet Data Network and web search.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables per-claim citation verification for AI-generated text by fetching cited sources and judging whether they support the claim, with verdicts and evidence quotes.
    31 npm
    MIT

TDQS

A4.6/5.0

Scored across 6 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool serves a distinct purpose: single claim verification, batch verification, claim extraction, security identifier resolution, delivery attestation, and badge generation. No two tools overlap in functionality, making selection unambiguous.

Naming Consistency4/5

Most tools use a verb_noun pattern (verify_claim, check_citations, extract_claims, resolve_instrument, attest_delivery). 'attribution_badge' deviates slightly by being noun_noun, but the overall pattern is coherent and readable.

Tool Count5/5

Six tools is a compact yet comprehensive set for the server's domain of fact-checking and attestation. Each tool earns its place without redundancy or clutter.

Completeness4/5

The tool set covers the core verification workflow—extracting claims, verifying single/batch claims, resolving identifiers, and attesting delivery. The absence of a direct source retrieval tool is a minor gap, but the workflow is largely complete.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessUnresponsive