Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Groundcheck

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Enables smart-money whale and market analytics for Polymarket, including leaderboards, wallet profiles, positions, market clusters, and alerts, through Claude Desktop and other MCP clients.
    6
    1
    MIT

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables agents to verify their own output mid-task by checking every claim against provided sources, returning supported, partial, unsupported, or contradicted verdicts with exact citations.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    F
    maintenance
    Verifies claims with verdicts (supported/disputed/unverifiable), confidence scores, and cited sources by cross-referencing FoundryNet Data Network and web search.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables per-claim citation verification for AI-generated text by fetching cited sources and judging whether they support the claim, with verdicts and evidence quotes.
    38 npm
    MIT
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables fact-checking claims by providing a verify_claim tool that returns a verdict (True/False/Misleading/Unverifiable) with confidence score and citations, using adversarial multi-agent RAG pipeline.
    1
    -
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    A verification component for agents that checks claims on public webpages and returns structured results with evidence text, screenshots, and deterministic JSON.
    -

TDQS

A4.6/5.0

Scored across 6 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool serves a distinct purpose: single claim verification, batch verification, claim extraction, security identifier resolution, delivery attestation, and badge generation. No two tools overlap in functionality, making selection unambiguous.

Naming Consistency4/5

Most tools use a verb_noun pattern (verify_claim, check_citations, extract_claims, resolve_instrument, attest_delivery). 'attribution_badge' deviates slightly by being noun_noun, but the overall pattern is coherent and readable.

Tool Count5/5

Six tools is a compact yet comprehensive set for the server's domain of fact-checking and attestation. Each tool earns its place without redundancy or clutter.

Completeness4/5

The tool set covers the core verification workflow—extracting claims, verifying single/batch claims, resolving identifiers, and attesting delivery. The absence of a direct source retrieval tool is a minor gap, but the workflow is largely complete.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessUnresponsive