mcp-dotnet
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-dotnet
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceILSpy for LLM coding agents. Reflection-based MCP server with 31+ tools to explore .NET assemblies, NuGet packages, types, members, attributes, and XML docs.8MIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that decompiles and inspects .NET assemblies to C# source, wrapping ILSpy. Enables querying .NET DLLs via natural language to decompile types, list members, and search symbols.7-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables static analysis and patching of .NET binaries through decompilation, IL analysis, renaming, and IL patching over the Model Context Protocol.25MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceCode context for AI coding agents. Progressive, on-demand access to your internal .NET / NuGet package source — agents browse, search, and read private C# libraries autonomously, with zero workspace pollution.240 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server providing 62 AI-optimized tools for .NET/C# semantic code analysis, navigation, refactoring, and code generation using Microsoft Roslyn. Built for AI coding agents - provides compiler-accurate code understanding that AI cannot infer from reading source files alone.6233MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceProvides C# coding agents with compiler-accurate symbol analysis, including references, renames, and impact analysis for .NET solutions.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: list-types for browsing, decompile-type for a single type, decompile-assembly for full project, and search-source for pattern matching. No functional overlap.
All tool names follow a consistent lowercase hyphenated verb_noun pattern (e.g., list-types, decompile-assembly), ensuring predictability.
With 4 tools, the server is well-scoped for its domain—covering browsing, targeted decompilation, full decompilation, and source search without unnecessary redundancy.
The set covers core decompilation workflows (list, decompile single, decompile all, search). A minor gap exists for decompiling specific members without the full type, but the overall surface is sufficient for typical use.