aeso-mcp

Overview Schema Source Related Servers Discussions Admin

Get Reserves

get_reserves

Read-onlyIdempotent

Access current AESO operating reserve indicators in megawatts, including contingency reserve required/dispatched and fast frequency response volumes when published.

Instructions

Returns current AESO operating reserve indicators in MW, including contingency reserve required/dispatched and fast frequency response volumes when published.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
No arguments

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`metadata`	Yes	Provenance and semantic metadata attached to dataset responses.
`warnings`	No
`observed_at`	Yes
`long_lead_time_volume_mw`	No
`contingency_reserve_required_mw`	No
`fast_frequency_response_offered_mw`	No
`dispatched_contingency_reserve_gen_mw`	No
`fast_frequency_response_dispatched_mw`	No
`dispatched_contingency_reserve_other_mw`	No
`dispatched_contingency_reserve_total_mw`	No

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed1 schema field changedv0.3.0Aug 28, 2026

changedOutput schema / properties / metadata / properties / provider / enum

Previous value: -[
-  "gridstatus",
-  "aeso_apim",
-  "aeso_public_report",
-  "derived"
-]New value: +[
+  "gridstatus",
+  "aeso_apim",
+  "aeso_public_report",
+  "aeso_csd_archive",
+  "derived"
+]

Changed13 schema fields changedv0.2.0Aug 24, 2026

addedOutput schema / properties / metadata / properties / available_series

Added value: +{
+  "items": {
+    "type": "string"
+  },
+  "type": "array"
+}

addedOutput schema / properties / metadata / properties / cache_age

Added value: +{
+  "anyOf": [
+    {
+      "type": "number"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "null"
+    }
+  ],
+  "default": null,
+  "description": "Age of the cached provider result in seconds when served."
+}

addedOutput schema / properties / metadata / properties / cache_hit
```
Added value: +{
+  "default": false,
+  "type": "boolean"
+}
```

addedOutput schema / properties / metadata / properties / completeness

Added value: +{
+  "default": "unknown",
+  "description": "Completeness of the requested observations or series.",
+  "enum": [
+    "complete",
+    "partial",
+    "degraded",
+    "empty",
+    "unknown"
+  ],
+  "type": "string"
+}

addedOutput schema / properties / metadata / properties / expected_observation_count

Added value: +{
+  "anyOf": [
+    {
+      "type": "integer"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "null"
+    }
+  ],
+  "default": null
+}

addedOutput schema / properties / metadata / properties / expected_observations

Added value: +{
+  "anyOf": [
+    {
+      "type": "integer"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "null"
+    }
+  ],
+  "default": null
+}

addedOutput schema / properties / metadata / properties / finality

Added value: +{
+  "default": "unknown",
+  "description": "Whether published observations are final or still preliminary.",
+  "enum": [
+    "final",
+    "preliminary",
+    "unknown"
+  ],
+  "type": "string"
+}

addedOutput schema / properties / metadata / properties / missing_observation_count

Added value: +{
+  "anyOf": [
+    {
+      "type": "integer"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "null"
+    }
+  ],
+  "default": null
+}

addedOutput schema / properties / metadata / properties / missing_observations

Added value: +{
+  "anyOf": [
+    {
+      "type": "integer"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "null"
+    }
+  ],
+  "default": null
+}

addedOutput schema / properties / metadata / properties / missing_series

Added value: +{
+  "items": {
+    "type": "string"
+  },
+  "type": "array"
+}

addedOutput schema / properties / metadata / properties / observation_type

Added value: +{
+  "default": "actual",
+  "description": "What kind of observation a response contains.\n\n``DataStatus`` predates this distinction and remains available for\ncompatibility.  ``observation_type`` should be used when a client needs\nto distinguish an actual observation from a forecast or a derived value.",
+  "enum": [
+    "actual",
+    "forecast",
+    "derived",
+    "unknown"
+  ],
+  "type": "string"
+}

changedOutput schema / properties / metadata / properties / provider / enum

Previous value: -[
-  "gridstatus",
-  "aeso_apim",
-  "derived"
-]New value: +[
+  "gridstatus",
+  "aeso_apim",
+  "aeso_public_report",
+  "derived"
+]

addedOutput schema / properties / metadata / properties / served_at

Added value: +{
+  "anyOf": [
+    {
+      "format": "date-time",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "null"
+    }
+  ],
+  "default": null
+}

First observedv0.1.1Aug 8, 2026

TDQS

A4.5/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already establish read-only, idempotent, non-destructive behavior. The description adds valuable behavioral context by noting that data is current, expressed in MW, and only available 'when published.' This goes beyond the structured annotations without contradicting them.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single purposeful sentence. It front-loads the core result and then adds the most important scope qualifier ('when published') without any filler or redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple parameterless read-only tool with an output schema, the description covers the essential information: what data is returned, the units, the current-time scope, and the publication dependency. No critical calling context is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so the parameter documentation burden is minimal. The description still adds useful context about units and data contents, which is more than required given the empty schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: it returns current AESO operating reserve indicators in MW. It further names exact contents (contingency reserve required/dispatched and fast frequency response volumes), which clearly differentiates it from sibling tools focused on prices, forecasts, or activations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear context: this tool is for current operating reserve indicators, not forecasts, activations, or prices. The phrase 'when published' also signals timing constraints. It does not explicitly name alternatives or exclusion conditions, but the context is strong enough for an agent to select it appropriately.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server