get_taxonomy

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, but description discloses tool is public and safe (read-only). This is sufficient for a no-parameter read operation, though additional details about rate limits or idempotency could be added.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences, front-loaded with purpose and use cases. No wasted words, every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given zero parameters, no annotations, and presence of an output schema, the description fully covers what the agent needs: what data is returned and when to call it.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters exist, so schema coverage is 100%. Description adds meaning by listing the types of data returned (post types, codes, states), which is valuable for the agent despite no params.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly specifies the tool returns canonical post types, FAR set-aside codes, and US states for the 'state' filter. It differentiates from siblings by positioning it as a discovery/validation helper rather than a search or mutation tool.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states when to use: 'safe to call before signup completes' and 'useful for validating user input before passing to find_opportunities.' Provides clear context and a specific sibling alternative.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.