bookmind.undo_categorize

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Describes the behavior: restoring previous category from audit log. No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. Lacks details on potential side effects or requirements, but adequately covers the primary action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with purpose, no wasted words. Effectively summarizes the tool's function and usage.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given low complexity (1 parameter, no output schema), the description covers purpose and usage adequately. Missing return value details, but action is straightforward.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, and the parameter description in schema matches the narrative description. No additional semantic value beyond what the schema provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description uses specific verb 'Undo' and resource 'categorization changes', clearly stating it restores previous categories from audit log. Differentiates from sibling tools like 'categorize' and 'approve_categorizations'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states when to use (to undo categorization changes) and how (by transaction IDs or 'all'). Does not explicitly mention when not to use or alternatives, but context from siblings makes it clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.