Skip to main content
Glama
molpass

liuren

by molpass

mcp-liuren

점단 일시를 받아 대육임(大六壬) 과를 세워 三傳·四課·天地盤·格局·神煞 텍스트와 천지반 PNG를 반환하는 MCP 서버. (Python 런타임)

구조·네이밍·PNG·설치 규약은 STANDARD.md를 따른다(§6 Python 블록).


구성 / 계산

  • 점단 엔진: kinliuren — 大六壬 과 생성.

  • 달력 레이어: lunar_python — 일시 → (節氣, 農曆月, 日干支, 時干支) 변환.

    • ⚠️ kinliuren은 간지·절기를 스스로 계산하지 않으므로 이 레이어가 필수다.

    • 절기명은 kinliuren이 기대하는 번체로 보정한다(惊蛰→驚蟄 등).

    • 月將은 점단 시각의 직전 절기(getPrevJieQi)로 결정한다.

  • 렌더: Pillow — 천지반 4×4 그리드, 한글/한자 폰트.

  • 결정론적: 같은 입력 → 같은 과.

간지 변환 신뢰성: 日干支 산출을 천문 JDN 공식(상수 JDN(2000-01-01)=2451545)과 교차검증했다. 예: 2024-02-10 = 甲辰일, 1949-10-01 = 甲子일(만세력 일치).


Related MCP server: mcp-ziwei

도구

get_liuren

파라미터

타입

필수

설명

datetime_str

string YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM

✅*

점단 일시

manualGanzhi

object

(선택) 간지 직접 입력 시 달력 변환 생략

* manualGanzhi를 주면 datetime_str은 생략 가능. manualGanzhi 형식: {"jieqi": "立春", "cmonth": 1, "dayGanzhi": "甲辰", "hourGanzhi": "辛未"}

출력 (둘 다 반환):

  1. 구조화 텍스트 — 三傳(支·天將·六親·遁干) / 四課 / 天地盤 / 格局 / 神煞(日馬)

  2. 천지반 PNG (1080×1080, 12궁 그리드 + 중앙 정보 패널)

예제 출력: examples/liuren_example.png (2024-02-10 14:30).


설치 (Python)

git clone https://github.com/molpass/mcp-liuren.git
cd mcp-liuren
python -m venv .venv && . .venv/bin/activate   # Windows: .venv\Scripts\activate
pip install -r requirements.txt

예제 천지반을 직접 생성해 보려면:

python examples/generate-example.py   # examples/liuren_example.png 재생성

폰트: 한자·한글 라벨을 위해 한글 가능 폰트가 필요하다. Windows는 Malgun Gothic 기본 탑재. Linux는 Noto CJK / Nanum 권장.


MCP 등록 (서버명 liuren, STANDARD §6 Python)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "liuren": {
      "command": "/abs/path/mcp-liuren/.venv/bin/python",
      "args": ["/abs/path/mcp-liuren/server.py"]
    }
  }
}

/abs/path는 실제 절대경로로 바꾼다. Windows 예: "command": "C:/Users/<you>/mcp-liuren/.venv/Scripts/python.exe", "args": ["C:/Users/<you>/mcp-liuren/server.py"]


스킬

페어링 스킬: skill/liuren.skill.md.

About / 제작

Hermes Agent용 MCP — molpass의 바이브 코딩(vibe coding) 프로젝트.

  • 아이디어·방향: molpass (이정훈) · https://zeolinex.com

  • 기획: Claude (Chat)

  • 개발: Claude Code

자가 호스팅 Hermes Agent에 도구로 붙여 쓰는 MCP 서버입니다.

같은 모음:

License

MIT

Available Tools

1 tool
get_liurenA

대육임 점단을 수행한다.

Args: datetime_str: 점단 일시 "YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM". 수동 간지를 주면 생략 가능. manualGanzhi: (선택) 간지 직접 입력 시 달력 변환을 생략한다. 형식: {"jieqi": "立春", "cmonth": 1, "dayGanzhi": "甲辰", "hourGanzhi": "辛未"}

Returns: 구조화 텍스트(三傳·四課·天地盤·格局·神煞)와 천지반 PNG.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
datetime_strNo
manualGanzhiNo

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must cover behavioral traits. It indicates the tool performs a computation (divination) and returns structured text and a PNG, but does not state whether it is read-only, has side effects, or requires specific permissions. The description is not misleading but insufficiently transparent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and well-structured: one sentence for purpose, then clearly labeled Args and Returns sections. Every sentence adds value without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's moderate complexity and lack of output schema, the description adequately covers the inputs (with format/optionality) and outputs (structured text + PNG). It could mention edge cases (e.g., what happens if both datetime_str and manualGanzhi are provided or omitted), but overall it is complete enough for an agent to invoke the tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description adds meaningful semantics: it explains the format of datetime_str and the optional manualGanzhi's structure with an example (jieqi, cmonth, etc.). This goes beyond the bare schema and helps an agent understand how to use the parameters correctly.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool performs '대육임 점단' (Dae-Yuk-im divination), a specific action on a specific resource. It includes details about arguments and returns, making the purpose unambiguous even without sibling context.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description indirectly provides usage guidance by explaining when to use manualGanzhi ('if you provide manual Ganzi, you can skip calendar conversion'). However, it lacks explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use statements, and there are no alternatives mentioned due to absence of siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. 1 tool updatev1.0.0
    • First observedget_liuren

TDQS

A3.9/5.0

Scored across 1 tool

Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no risk of ambiguity. The tool has a clear, distinct purpose.

Naming Consistency5/5

A single tool named 'get_liuren' follows a conventional verb_noun pattern, and there are no other tools to cause inconsistency.

Tool Count2/5

One tool is too few for typical server scopes. While the server targets a specific divination, additional tools for related operations (e.g., interpretation or history) would improve coverage.

Completeness3/5

The tool covers the core divination operation, but lacks auxiliary functions like retrieving previous results or validating input, which may limit agent workflows.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables traditional Chinese divination calculations through Liu Ren (六壬) chart generation. Provides tools for calculating Liu Ren divination charts based on specified dates and times, along with current time retrieval functionality.
    -
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Calculates and returns a Ziwei Doushu (Purple Star Astrology) chart based on birth date, time, and gender. Returns both structured text of the 12 palaces and a PNG image of the chart.
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Evaluates Qimen Dunjia divination for a given date and time, returning structured text and a 9-palace PNG chart.
    MIT