Skip to main content
Glama
bayrakdaralper

site-intelligence-mcp

by bayrakdaralper
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to site-intelligence-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • microfarm-mcp

      omardaaboul
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to assess any parcel for micro-farm viability (climate, water, farmland context, access, flood risk) and dwelling feasibility, and to find real land for sale from free, keyless public data sources.
      5
      1
      MIT

    • eo-mcp

      eo-mcp
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to autonomously discover, stream, and compute satellite analytics from free government Earth-observation catalogs such as Sentinel-2, Landsat, and Copernicus DEM, with zero API keys or configuration. It supports place-name geocoding, STAC scene search, cloud-native COG streaming for spectral indices, elevation profiles, SAR flood detection, and sandboxed custom geospatial scripts.
      Apache 2.0

    • eo-mcp

      eo-mcp
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to autonomously discover, stream, and compute satellite analytics from free government Earth observation archives. Provides tools for STAC search, spectral indices, elevation profiles, SAR water detection, and sandboxed geospatial scripting.
      Apache 2.0

    • DEM Terrain Analysis

      ava11235
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      AI-powered terrain analysis for any location on Earth. Uses super-resolution and computes environmental risk metrics including erosion, water flow, and a composite Site Intelligence Score.
      3
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlap with other tools. The tool has a clear, singular purpose of scoring a coordinate for suitability.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The single tool name 'site_score' is descriptive and follows a readable noun_verb convention. However, with only one tool there is no established pattern to evaluate consistency across the set.

    Tool Count2/5

    A single tool feels too thin for an MCP server focused on site intelligence. While the tool itself is substantive, the server's scope would reasonably include at least a few related operations, such as batch comparison or historical analysis.

    Completeness2/5

    The server only offers live scoring of one coordinate at a time. Obvious gaps include no way to compare multiple candidate sites, no batch processing, and no persistence or historical trend analysis, which are common needs in site selection and land assessment.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources