Skip to main content
Glama
basicmachines-co

basic-memory

by basicmachines-co
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to basic-memory

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Memento

      scrypster
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides persistent memory for AI tools by building a local knowledge graph from conversations, enabling cross-session recall and context awareness without cloud dependencies.
      9
      MIT

    • MCP Memory Server

      jessefreitas
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Provides persistent memory functionality for AI conversations by creating, managing and querying entities and relationships in a knowledge graph. Features SQLite storage, advanced search capabilities, and Windows auto-start integration for long-term AI memory retention.
      13 npm
      MIT

    • Obsidian Memory MCP

      YuNaga224
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Stores AI memories as Markdown files for visualization in Obsidian's graph view, allowing users to create knowledge graphs with entities, relations, and observations.
      9
      33
      MIT

    • local-memory-mcp

      mason-yb-zhang
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with persistent, local cross-session shared memory by combining vector semantic retrieval with knowledge graph relationships, and supports short/long-term memory management and local backups.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 17 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    There is significant overlap between several tools, creating confusion. For example, 'search' and 'search_notes' appear to serve very similar purposes, and 'read_note' and 'view_note' both seem to retrieve notes with unclear distinctions. However, descriptions help differentiate some tools like 'edit_note' versus 'write_note', preventing complete ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., 'create_memory_project', 'delete_note', 'list_directory'), which is clear and predictable. Minor deviations exist, such as 'build_context' and 'canvas' not following this pattern, but they are exceptions rather than the rule, maintaining overall readability.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 17 tools, the count is borderline high for a memory management server, feeling slightly heavy but not excessive. It covers various operations like CRUD for notes and projects, but the overlap suggests some tools could be consolidated, making the set feel a bit bloated for the domain.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set provides good coverage for memory and note management, including create, read, update, delete, search, and project handling. Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit tool for updating project details or managing links beyond moving notes, but core workflows are well-supported, allowing agents to work around these limitations.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessResponsive

    Resources