Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-remote-macos-use

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables AI to fully control macOS — mouse, keyboard, terminal, screenshots, window management, UI element detection, and provides AI-optimized information reporting.
      36
      29 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives AI agents real OS-level control of macOS, enabling them to click real buttons, type real keys, and observe rendered screens just like a human would.
      128 PyPI
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      macOS MCP server that enables AI agents to directly control the host OS, including mouse, keyboard, windows, files, and accessibility automation for computer-use workflows.
      1
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enterprise-grade macOS MCP server that gives AI agents eyes, hands, and a terminal, enabling screen capture, mouse/keyboard control, shell commands, and file operations.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool has a clearly distinct purpose focused on specific remote macOS interactions: screen capture, various mouse operations (click, double-click, drag-and-drop, move, scroll), application opening, and keyboard input. There is no overlap in functionality, making tool selection unambiguous.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent 'remote_macos_verb_noun' pattern using snake_case throughout (e.g., remote_macos_mouse_click, remote_macos_send_keys). This predictable naming scheme enhances readability and usability for agents.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 8 tools, the server is well-scoped for remote macOS control, covering essential input/output operations (mouse, keyboard, screen, apps). Each tool earns its place without redundancy, and the count is typical for this domain.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset provides strong coverage for basic remote desktop control, including visual feedback, mouse/keyboard input, and app management. A minor gap exists in lacking tools for file system access or system information retrieval, but core workflows are well-supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive