MCP Headless Gmail Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to MCP Headless Gmail Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables reading and sending Gmail messages in headless/remote environments without local credential storage, using OAuth tokens passed directly in API calls for containerized deployments.314 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceSelf-hosted Gmail gateway MCP server that enables searching and fetching emails from multiple authorized Gmail mailboxes via a single backend authorization boundary.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables reading, sending, archiving, and managing Gmail emails and labels through Google OAuth authentication, acting as an OAuth proxy to the Gmail API.146 npm11MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables applications to interact with Gmail through a clean API, supporting email searching, sending, reading, and label management.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceA local MCP server that provides Gmail tools (search, read, send, draft, label management) while keeping your emails only between your machine and Google, with no third-party access.6MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that exposes the Gmail API for integration with LLMs, enabling email management tasks such as reading, labeling, and searching emails.7MIT
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: retrieving email body chunks, listing recent emails, refreshing tokens, and sending emails. There is no overlap in functionality that would cause confusion or misselection.
All tools follow a consistent 'gmail_verb_noun' pattern with snake_case, making them predictable and easy to understand. The naming convention is uniform across all four tools.
With 4 tools, the count is reasonable for a Gmail server, though it feels slightly thin for covering all common email operations. It includes core functions but could benefit from additional tools like searching or managing drafts.
The tools cover basic email operations (read, list, send) and authentication, but there are notable gaps such as searching emails, managing labels, or handling attachments. This could limit agents in performing more complex email tasks.