Skip to main content
Glama
bartest5

mcp-server-qdrant

by bartest5
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-server-qdrant

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • better-qdrant-mcp

      jtsang4
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides long-term memory and semantic search using Qdrant and OpenAI embeddings, with tools for storing, searching, and managing knowledge.
      6
      57 PyPI
      1
      MIT

    • MCP Server for Qdrant

      Jimmy974
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Machine Control Protocol (MCP) server that enables storing and retrieving information from a Qdrant vector database with semantic search capabilities.
      Apache 2.0

    • garnet-mcp

      tarazou9
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides long-term semantic memory via Garnet Vector Sets, enabling agents to store text embeddings and retrieve relevant context across sessions. It exposes tools for storing, recalling, and managing memories using pluggable embedding providers.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: qdrant-find retrieves memories while qdrant-store saves them. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow the same 'qdrant-<verb>' pattern, using lowercase snake case. The verb clearly indicates the action (find vs. store), making the naming predictable and consistent.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only two tools, the server feels minimal for a memory system. While find and store cover basic operations, the count is borderline and could easily support more operations like delete or list.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool surface covers create (store) and read (find) but lacks update and delete operations for memories. This is a notable gap for a complete lifecycle, though the core functionality works.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources