Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP-Discord

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A Discord Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants to interact with Discord by sending messages, managing channels, handling forum posts, managing webhooks, and processing reactions.
      22
      55 npm
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that gives AI assistants full access to Discord via a user token, enabling reading and sending messages, managing threads, reacting, searching history, sending DMs, and more.
      20
      116 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Discord MCP server that enables AI assistants to interact with the Discord platform, providing features like message sending, channel management, forum operations, reactions, and webhook management.
      22
      431 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Discord MCP server that enables AI assistants to interact with Discord platforms, providing functionalities like sending messages, managing channels, creating forum posts, and handling webhooks.
      21
      431 npm
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.9/5.0

    Scored across 46 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Multiple tools have overlapping purposes, such as 'discord_read_messages' vs 'discord_search_messages' and 'discord_reply_to_forum' vs 'discord_create_forum_post', which could confuse agents. The distinction between 'get', 'list', and 'read' is not always clear.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools follow a consistent 'discord_verb_object' pattern, making the naming predictable. However, there is some verb variation (get, list, read, search) that slightly reduces strict consistency, but overall it is well-structured.

    Tool Count1/5

    With 46 tools, this far exceeds the recommended 3-15 scope for a well-designed MCP server. The high number of tools likely overwhelms agents and increases selection complexity, making it inappropriate for most use cases.

    Completeness2/5

    Despite the large number of tools, there are notable gaps such as missing getters for channels, webhooks, and roles (e.g., 'get_channel', 'list_webhooks'). Core operations like updating a message or deleting a webhook are present, but the surface is uneven and overfocused on creation/deletion.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSlow