smart_reframe

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must fully disclose behavioral traits. It only says 'Apply Smart Reframe' without explaining whether the operation is destructive, reversible, or what side effects occur. The AI-based nature is mentioned but lacks detail on constraints or outcomes.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and front-loaded, but underinformative. Every sentence is necessary but could be expanded without becoming verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of AI-based reframing and the presence of an output schema not mentioned, the description is incomplete. It lacks information about prerequisites (beyond Neural Engine), return values, or error conditions.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, but the description groups parameters as 'Clip locator', adding minimal meaning. However, it fails to explain each parameter's role or acceptable values, leaving ambiguity for an AI agent.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool applies Smart Reframe to a timeline item, identifying it as AI-based reframing. The purpose is specific and distinct from sibling tools like stabilize or create_magic_mask, though no explicit differentiation is provided.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use Smart Reframe versus other tools or alternatives. The only mention is a prerequisite (DaVinci Resolve Studio with Neural Engine), which is necessary but insufficient for usage decisions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.