search_mcp_plesk_dev_docs

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations present, the description must convey behavioral traits. It only states 'search' without explaining what the search returns (e.g., list of documents, snippets), whether it supports pagination, or any limitations. This is minimal information.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise at one sentence, but could include more detail without becoming verbose. It is front-loaded with the action and resource, which is good.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given only two parameters and an output schema (though not shown), the description is adequate but fails to mention return format or any additional details that would fully prepare an agent to use the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has two parameters, but only 'category' includes a description. The description does not explain the 'query' parameter beyond its type, nor does it clarify how the optional 'category' filter works. Overall, little value added beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'search' and the resource 'unified Plesk documentation', making the tool's purpose obvious. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from sibling tools, though no sibling appears to have a similar purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any context about prerequisites or limitations. The description is a single sentence with no usage hints.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.