wallet
Retrieve your wallet details for managing SNS DAO tokens on the Internet Computer.
Instructions
get my wallet
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve your wallet details for managing SNS DAO tokens on the Internet Computer.
get my wallet
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description 'get' implies a read-only operation, but without annotations, it does not explicitly state whether the tool modifies state or requires authentication. The behavior is straightforward but not fully disclosed.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence that directly communicates the tool's purpose. There is no unnecessary information, and it is front-loaded.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The description does not explain return values or what the wallet contains. Given no output schema, the description should provide more context about the result, but it remains vague.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
There are no parameters, so the input schema provides complete coverage. The description adds no parameter information, but with zero parameters, the baseline of 4 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description 'get my wallet' clearly indicates retrieving the user's wallet. It is distinct from sibling tools like list_proposals or vote_proposal, but lacks elaboration on what 'wallet' specifically refers to.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description does not mention context or prerequisites for using the wallet retrieval.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/baolongt/sns-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server