get_detected_apps_for_device

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the burden of behavioral disclosure. It notes 'beta endpoint', which signals potential instability, but does not mention whether the operation is read-only, error behavior, authentication requirements, or response format. The 'Get' verb implies read-only, but more context would be helpful.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One concise sentence of twelve words, front-loaded with the verb and object, and no filler. Every word adds value, including the beta endpoint caveat.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple with only one parameter and an output schema exists, so extensive description is not necessary. The description covers the core purpose and the 'beta' caveat, which is sufficient for an agent to select and invoke the tool. Minor gaps around read-only confirmation and error handling are non-critical but prevent a perfect score.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema only provides the parameter name 'device_id' with 0% coverage in the description. However, the description clarifies that the tool works on 'a specific Intune managed device', giving meaningful context to the device_id parameter. For a single self-explanatory parameter, this is adequate compensation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states a specific action ('Get') and a specific resource ('applications detected on a specific Intune managed device'), which unambiguously distinguishes it from sibling tools like get_managed_device_by_id or get_device_compliance_policy_states. The mention of 'beta endpoint' adds contextual specificity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for retrieving detected applications for a particular device, but provides no explicit guidance on when to choose this over alternatives (e.g., get_managed_device_by_id for device details) or any exclusions. Context is reasonably clear but not explicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.