delete_row_docx

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It notes the row_index is 0-indexed, which is helpful, but says nothing about whether deletion is irreversible, whether the file is saved to disk, what happens to out-of-range indices, or what the response contains. For a destructive mutation this is a significant gap.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single short sentence with zero filler, front-loading the action and resource before the index qualifier. Nothing is wasted.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need not be described, but the definition remains thin for a destructive mutation with no annotations and 0% parameter coverage. It should at minimum explain table_index and file_path semantics and note the irreversibility of the operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate for all three parameters. It only clarifies row_index (0-indexed) and implicitly references the table; table_index and file_path are left completely unexplained with no format, path conventions, or index basis for table_index.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: deleting one particular row from a docx table. It clearly distinguishes itself from sibling operations like delete_column_docx and delete_table_docx by scoping to a single row. However, it does not explicitly name those siblings or clarify boundaries with add_row_docx-style operations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as delete_table_docx or delete_column_docx, nor any prerequisites (e.g. the table must already exist, the index must be in range). Usage is only implied by the verb.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.