flow-team-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to flow-team-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables interaction with the kickflow workflow management API through MCP, supporting comprehensive operations for tickets, approvals, users, teams, workflows, comments, and organizational management.1474MIT- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP hosts to call the Teamline API for user authentication, task listing, creation, completion, and webhook management.6MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables test execution and management through MCP clients, allowing retrieval of projects, listing tests, executing tests with browser selection, and monitoring results.67MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables interaction with the hosted PacedLoop API to manage workflows and monitor process runs. It provides tools for workflow CRUD operations, run execution management, and access to detailed performance analytics within MCP-capable clients.-
- FlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceFacilitates access to LumbreTravel API for managing travel programs, activities, and related entities through MCP clients.68131-
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables interaction with the Procesio automation platform to list, view, and manage workflows. It allows users to launch process instances and monitor their status through MCP-compatible clients.12Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 11 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes: listing vs fetching a single endpoint, project vs participant-specific project lists, and different column types. However, get_project_columns and get_project_status_columns could be confused, and list_projects vs list_participant_projects may overlap without careful reading.
The naming convention is predominantly verb_noun snake_case (get_, list_, create_, add_) which is predictable. The exception is flow_request, which does not follow the get/list pattern but still communicates its action clearly.
With 11 tools, the set is well-scoped for a Flow project management and API integration server. Each tool addresses a distinct need, and the count is within the ideal 3-15 range without feeling bloated or thin.
The server covers core project operations: listing/creating projects, managing participants, accessing columns, and handling API endpoints including schema, list, get, and invocation. Missing are update/delete for projects or participants, but these may be out of scope for the intended workflows.