Skip to main content
Glama
badchars
by badchars

epss_top

Retrieves the top CVEs ranked by EPSS exploitation probability to identify vulnerabilities most likely to be exploited.

Instructions

Get the top CVEs ranked by EPSS exploitation probability. Shows the most likely-to-be-exploited vulnerabilities.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoNumber of results (default 20)
minScoreNoMinimum EPSS score filter (0-1, e.g., 0.5 for 50%+)
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavior, but it omits details like default ordering, pagination, data freshness, and interaction with parameters such as minScore.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, no redundancy, efficient communication of the tool's purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Adequate for a simple tool, but lacks description of output format and behavioral details, which would improve completeness given no output schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the description adds minimal extra meaning beyond the parameter descriptions; baseline score applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves top CVEs ranked by EPSS exploitation probability, differentiating it from sibling tools like epss_score which likely targets specific CVEs.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit usage guidelines or alternatives mentioned; the context of sibling tools implies its use for an overview, but lacks clear direction.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/badchars/cve-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server