tummy_times_delete_tummy_time

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Since no annotations exist, the description carries the full behavioral disclosure burden, and 'This action is permanent' clearly communicates the irreversible destructive nature of the call. It does not mention permissions or cascade effects, but for a single-record delete the permanence warning is the most critical behavioral trait and it is present.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two terse sentences with no filler. The core operation comes first and the critical permanence warning follows immediately, so every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a one-parameter delete operation with a required ID, an output schema, and no nested objects, the description plus schema is sufficient to invoke the tool correctly. It covers what is deleted and the irreversible consequence, while the ID semantics live entirely in the schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and the schema already documents tummy_time_id as the ID of the record to permanently delete. The description adds no new format, constraints, or meaning beyond what the schema provides, so the baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names the exact operation (delete) and resource (a tummy time record), so an agent can immediately tell it apart from the many sibling delete tools for other resources. The permanence note also reinforces that this is a hard delete, distinct from update or create operations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance is provided, and no alternative sibling is named. The use case is only implied by the delete verb, so the agent gets no help deciding between this and update/list operations.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.