Skip to main content
Glama
babazulu

plane-mcp

by babazulu
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to plane-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • claude-plane

      FishyF1sh
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server and automation watcher for Plane project management, enabling Claude to interact with Plane via 40+ tools and auto-trigger on labeled issues.
      -

    • Plane MCP

      Rockysingh116
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables LLMs to fully manage a Plane workspace, including projects, work items, states, labels, cycles, modules, comments, and members.
      38
      MIT

    • plane-ce-mcp

      Bl4nk44
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Unofficial MCP server for self-hosted Plane Community Edition, enabling project management tasks like managing work items, cycles, modules, and initiatives via natural language.
      100
      2
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 16 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct resources and actions (list_members, list_labels, list_states, create_task, etc.), but change_status overlaps with update_task (both can modify status) and add_comment_with_image overlaps with add_comment. The descriptions clarify the differences, so ambiguity is limited.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (list_*, create_task, update_task, add_comment). Minor deviations include change_status (could be update_status) and add_comment_with_image (longer but still verb_noun). No camelCase or mixed conventions.

    Tool Count4/5

    16 tools is slightly above the typical 3-15 range but reasonable for a project management server covering tasks, attachments, comments, labels, states, and members. Each tool serves a distinct purpose within the scope.

    Completeness3/5

    The surface covers core task operations (create, read, update, status change) and attachments/comments, but lacks task deletion and label/member management. The server appears read-focused for config entities, yet missing delete for tasks is a notable gap.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources