arcium-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to arcium-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with cryptocurrency ecosystems through wallet management, trading operations (swaps, DCA, limit orders), staking, and multi-chain support starting with Solana.37GPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceConnects AI agents to decentralized, community-built APIs on Solana, enabling autonomous discovery, payment, and execution of tools without subscriptions or API keys.5 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to read chain data, execute transactions, swap tokens, and manage wallets on Solana through 38 tools across 7 modules. Supports write operations with a private key and includes built-in prompts for common workflows.381MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with the Solana blockchain for DeFi, NFTs, and Web3 tasks through 38 tools, 10 prompts, and 7 modules.38MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with the Solana blockchain, manage accounts and tokens, and develop and deploy smart contracts end-to-end.4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with the Solana blockchain network, supporting documentation search, blockchain queries, wallet management, and cryptographic signing operations on Devnet and Testnet.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 19 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource or action: key generation, encryption/decryption, network info (clusters, nodes, MXEs), computation status, and specific applications (coinflip, RPS, vote, bid). No two tools have overlapping purposes; even similar-sounding tools like get vs list are clearly scoped to individual vs aggregate.
All tool names follow a consistent `arcium_verb_noun` pattern using snake_case. Verbs are informative (encrypt, decrypt, generate, get, list, play, await, check) and nouns clearly indicate the target. No mixed conventions or vague names.
19 tools is well-scoped for a platform offering key management, encryption/decryption, network queries, computation monitoring, and interactive MPC games. Each tool serves a clear purpose without redundancy, and the count feels complete for the advertised features.
The tool surface covers querying network state, encryption/decryption, and predefined games/voting, but lacks explicit tools to initiate custom computations or submit encrypted data for MPC processing. This gap means agents cannot perform the full lifecycle of a custom computation using the server alone.