arcium-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to arcium-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with cryptocurrency ecosystems through wallet management, trading operations (swaps, DCA, limit orders), staking, and multi-chain support starting with Solana.37GPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceConnects AI agents to decentralized, community-built APIs on Solana, enabling autonomous discovery, payment, and execution of tools without subscriptions or API keys.6 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to read chain data, execute transactions, swap tokens, and manage wallets on Solana through 38 tools across 7 modules. Supports write operations with a private key and includes built-in prompts for common workflows.381MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with the Solana blockchain for DeFi, NFTs, and Web3 tasks through 38 tools, 10 prompts, and 7 modules.38MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with the Solana blockchain, manage accounts and tokens, and develop and deploy smart contracts end-to-end.4-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with the Solana blockchain network, supporting documentation search, blockchain queries, wallet management, and cryptographic signing operations on Devnet and Testnet.-
TDQS
Scored across 19 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource or action: key generation, encryption/decryption, network info (clusters, nodes, MXEs), computation status, and specific applications (coinflip, RPS, vote, bid). No two tools have overlapping purposes; even similar-sounding tools like get vs list are clearly scoped to individual vs aggregate.
All tool names follow a consistent `arcium_verb_noun` pattern using snake_case. Verbs are informative (encrypt, decrypt, generate, get, list, play, await, check) and nouns clearly indicate the target. No mixed conventions or vague names.
19 tools is well-scoped for a platform offering key management, encryption/decryption, network queries, computation monitoring, and interactive MPC games. Each tool serves a clear purpose without redundancy, and the count feels complete for the advertised features.
The tool surface covers querying network state, encryption/decryption, and predefined games/voting, but lacks explicit tools to initiate custom computations or submit encrypted data for MPC processing. This gap means agents cannot perform the full lifecycle of a custom computation using the server alone.