Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to fender-studio-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that lets Claude and other MCP clients read PreSonus Studio One .song files directly and drive a running Studio One through an in-app bridge device. It exposes tools for songs, tracks, takes, markers, transport, mixer channels, meters and roughly 1,000 Studio One commands.
      27
      39 npm
      12
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients such as Claude Code to operate Logic Pro — transport, track selection/mute/solo/arm, mixer volume and pan, 8-band Channel EQ, and insert plugin slots — by emulating a Mackie Control surface over a CoreMIDI virtual port. Every command is verified against the LED, fader, and LCD feedback Logic sends back, so results report whether each action actually took effect.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An unofficial MCP server that lets an agent control Fender Studio Pro / PreSonus Studio One — transport playback, Mackie Control mixer moves, shortcut-driven track and session editing, plug-in listing and insert-macro generation, and DAW command discovery and dispatch from an exported key scheme. It also ships audio-to-MIDI workflows for drafting drums or a hummed melody from rehearsal recordings before arranging them in the DAW.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables Claude or any MCP client to view and control a Cubase/Nuendo project in real time, including transport, tempo, locators, mixer, channel strip, inserts, plug-in parameters, and 1,454 commands. It also supports music generation and recording notes into tracks.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 59 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools target distinct Studio One resources and actions, but there is meaningful overlap: live_command duplicates many specialized commands, live_events/live_edit_events/live_track_edit all modify events, and live_tracks/live_events/live_notes are easy to confuse for inspection. The detailed descriptions help, but the large surface still creates real selection ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The naming is mostly consistent snake_case with recognizable prefixes: live_ for the running Studio One, song_ for saved song files, and audio_ for capture/analysis. Some tools use noun-style getter names while others use verb_style action names, but the pattern remains readable and predictable overall.

    Tool Count2/5

    At 59 tools, the surface is very heavy for an MCP server and well beyond the typical 3-15 range. The DAW domain is broad, but many operations could be consolidated, especially given the generic live_command escape hatch and several overlapping inspection/edit tools.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers a wide range of Studio One workflows: transport, tracks, events, notes, mixer channels, inserts, sends, markers, arranger sections, automation, recording, undo/redo, snapshots, and audio analysis. Minor gaps remain, such as no explicit song creation/open/close and no mixdown or stem export, but most workflows are reachable.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSyncing