Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to answer-check-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to verify their own output mid-task by checking every claim against provided sources, returning supported, partial, unsupported, or contradicted verdicts with exact citations.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables production-grade answer verification for LLM agents by independently re-checking answers with a configurable verifier model, enforcing confidence policies, and producing Ed25519-signed, auditable verification results with optional web search and knowledge-base evidence.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables per-claim citation verification for AI-generated text by fetching cited sources and judging whether they support the claim, with verdicts and evidence quotes.
      58 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables language models to verify claims against a local document corpus by returning a literal supporting quote, a contradiction, or an explicit refusal when evidence is insufficient. Runs deterministically offline over local sources without network access or LLM calls.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to verify claims deterministically by computing arithmetic, ratios, and dates and matching statements against provided sources, returning a confidence ladder of certain, source-backed, or unverifiable.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    There is only one tool, so there is no possibility of confusing it with another. Its purpose—sentence-level verification of an answer against sources—is stated precisely and includes clear output semantics (supported/unsupported/unchecked).

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single name check_answer follows a clean verb_noun snake_case convention. With one tool there is no opportunity for inconsistent naming to creep in.

    Tool Count3/5

    A one-tool surface is thin, but the server appears deliberately scoped to a single deterministic verification operation, so the tool is not arbitrary. It sits at the borderline of the count guideline rather than being a clear mismatch.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool covers its stated domain: it checks each sentence, reports per-sentence status, and supplies replacement values where possible. Minor gaps exist—no batch/multi-answer mode or configuration of source handling—but core verification is covered with no dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues