Skip to main content
Glama
adamrowles1996

vaultgate

vaultgate

CI CodeQL OpenSSF Scorecard License: Apache-2.0

A self-hosted, remote MCP server that lets hosted AI agents such as Claude, Claude Cowork, Claude Code and Codex use your credentials without ever seeing them. The credentials stay in your Bitwarden (or Vaultwarden) vault. vaultgate uses them on the agent's behalf against systems you define (an HTTP API, Microsoft Graph, a SQL Server or PostgreSQL database, an SSH or WinRM host, a GitHub repository searched with Semble) under your policy, and hands back only the result. It is its own OAuth 2.1 authorization server, so the agent holds a short-lived, scoped, revocable token and nothing else.

Status: release candidate. Milestones M1 to M7 are merged: configuration, SQLite store, operator identity with TOTP, the OAuth 2.1 authorization server, the MCP tool surface, the managed bw serve backend, the audit trail, packaging and the Azure template. M8 (hardening and compatibility evidence) is in progress. The actions layer, opt-in and off by default, has landed through M14: M9 the engine, the operator pages and the http connector, M10 the Microsoft Graph credential adapter, M11 sql, M12 ssh, M13 winrm, and M14 the policy-form validation messages, the call-history and unexpected-write views, grant management from the connected-clients list and the elicitation hardening. M16 adds the code connector: Semble code search over private GitHub repositories, with its sidecar (guide). browser is M15; see docs/PLAN.md.

Why

A credential an agent can read ends up in the transcript. Once an agent reveals a password in order to use it, the value sits in the model's context, in the chat transcript, in the client's logs and on whatever command line the agent builds, and revoking the agent does not take it back. vaultgate is built so that the agent never needs the value:

  • Use, don't read. With the actions layer enabled (guide, spec 13 and 13a, ADR 0007), an agent names a target you defined and describes an operation: an HTTP request, a SQL query or statement, a command on an SSH or WinRM host, a Semble search of a GitHub repository. vaultgate fetches the credential from the vault, connects to the pinned destination, runs the operation inside your policy, scrubs every injected value from the result and returns what is left. An agent never supplies a host, a URL base, a database name or a credential; its arguments change what runs, never where or as whom.

  • Writes are opt-in three times. A write needs its own scope at consent, a target policy that allows it and, when you ask for it, a human confirmation on every call; the console lists every write that ran without one.

  • One audited door for the rare value that must be read. The vault tools return metadata. A single tool returns a secret value, one field of one item per call, behind its own scope, with every call audited.

  • Nothing runs on the vaultgate host. No tool runs whatever an agent sends wherever it likes: ssh_run and winrm_run run one command on one configured host under your allowlist (a target that accepts any command needs both its own flag and the deployment's consent), and every operation executes at its target.

  • The agent holds a token and nothing else. The master password and API key live only in the vaultgate process on your host, encrypted under your secret key once you connect the vault on the console's Vault page.

  • Standards as written. OAuth 2.1, PKCE, RFC 9728 / 8414 / 8707 / 7591 / 7009 / 9207 and Client ID Metadata Documents, per the MCP authorization specification (2026-07-28).

  • Any Bitwarden. bitwarden.com, bitwarden.eu, self-hosted Bitwarden and Vaultwarden.

  • Boring to operate. One process, one SQLite file, structured logs, health probes, an audit trail. docker compose up is a complete installation.

Compared with other Bitwarden MCP servers

Hosted agents reach MCP servers over HTTPS and cannot run a process next to your vault, and the other Bitwarden MCP servers are built for exactly that local process:

Server

Where it runs

Who holds the master password / API key

Client authorization

Consent and scopes

Revocation

Audit trail

Using a credential without seeing it

Official bitwarden/mcp-server

Local, stdio; its README says it must never be hosted publicly

Your machine: the bw CLI session (BW_SESSION) in the client's configuration, or an OS password dialog

None; whoever launches the process

None; every tool is available to the launching client

Lock the vault or end the bw session

Not described

Not described

warden-mcp, remote mode

A long-running HTTP service you host

The client, which sends them as X-BW-Password, X-BW-ClientId and X-BW-ClientSecret headers on every call

None built in ("no built-in authentication layer in v1")

None; READONLY and NOREVEAL switches apply to every client alike

Rotate the Bitwarden credentials

Not described

Not described

Typical community servers, e.g. vaultwarden-mcp, bitwarden-mcp-server

Local stdio, or a plain HTTP port

The server process, from environment variables holding the e-mail address and master password

None

None

Rotate the Bitwarden credentials

Not described

Not described

vaultgate

Your host, reachable over HTTPS by hosted agents

The vaultgate process only; the agent holds an opaque token

Built-in OAuth 2.1 authorization server: operator login with TOTP, PKCE, RFC 9728 / 8414 / 8707 / 7591 / 7009 / 9207, Client ID Metadata Documents

Per-client consent page; vault:read, vault:reveal, vault:generate, vault:write (off by default); actions:* scopes for each enabled connector

Per client or per token from the console's Agents page; refresh tokens rotate and a replay revokes the family

Every tool call, login, consent, token issue, refresh and revocation, exportable

Typed actions at targets you define: http (with Microsoft Graph), sql, ssh, winrm, code (Semble)

"Not described" means the project's README does not document one. Dated verification notes with links, and when the official stdio server is the better choice: docs/comparison.md.

Related MCP server: Agentic Vault

Quick start

The current version is 0.1.0-rc.22 (package.json; releases are tagged on GitHub). On a VM with Docker Engine, the Compose plugin, a DNS name pointing at it and ports 80 and 443 reachable from the internet:

git clone https://github.com/adamrowles1996/vaultgate.git
cd vaultgate
cp .env.example .env

Set VAULTGATE_DOMAIN, VAULTGATE_PUBLIC_URL and VAULTGATE_VERSION in .env, then:

mkdir -p secrets
head -c 32 /dev/urandom | base64 > secrets/vaultgate_secret_key
touch secrets/bw_password secrets/bw_client_secret
chmod 0400 secrets/* && sudo chown 10001 secrets/*
docker compose up -d
docker compose logs -f vaultgate

First run: the log prints a one-time /setup?token=… URL. Open it and create the operator account with an e-mail address, a password and a code from your authenticator (TOTP). That password is vaultgate's own operator login; it is not, and never becomes, your Bitwarden master password. Sign in, and on the Vault page connect the vault: server, API key client id and secret, and master password. vaultgate stores that connection encrypted under VAULTGATE_SECRET_KEY, so it survives restarts and upgrades. Then add https://<host>/mcp to Claude (or Claude Code, Codex, the MCP Inspector) as a remote MCP server and approve the scopes on the consent page. The bw CLI that vaultgate drives is bundled in the image and installed by install.sh; nothing else is needed on the host. Walkthrough: docs/guides/first-run.md; details and the verification of the image: docs/guides/install-docker-compose.md.

To let agents use credentials rather than read them, set VAULTGATE_ENABLE_ACTIONS=true and the switch for each connector you want, restart, and add connections (targets) on the console's Connections page: docs/guides/actions.md.

How it works

Claude / Codex ──HTTPS + Bearer──▶ vaultgate ──loopback──▶ bw serve ──▶ Bitwarden
                 ▲                    │    │
                 │                    │    └──pinned──▶ your API, database, SSH or WinRM host
                 └── OAuth 2.1 ◀──────┘        (credential injected by vaultgate, result scrubbed)
                   (consent page, operator login with TOTP)
  1. An agent calls /mcp and is challenged with WWW-Authenticate.

  2. It discovers the authorization server from the protected resource metadata, registers (Client ID Metadata Document, dynamic registration, or a pre-registered id) and sends you to the consent page.

  3. You log in (password + TOTP) and approve the scopes: vault:read, vault:reveal, vault:generate, optionally vault:write, and the actions:* scopes of each connector the deployment enables.

  4. With an actions:* scope, the agent lists the targets granted to it and calls them: http_request, sql_query, sql_execute, ssh_run, winrm_run, and code_search, code_find_related and code_read for Semble connections. vaultgate fetches the credential from the vault, performs the operation at the target and returns the scrubbed result; the credential never reaches the agent.

  5. With the vault scopes, it can search items, read metadata, reveal one secret field at a time, generate passwords and, if allowed, create or update items.

Install

TLS is always terminated in front of vaultgate; every method below ends with a public https:// origin that hosted agents can reach.

Method

Guide

Docker Compose with Caddy (recommended)

docs/guides/install-docker-compose.md

Debian or Ubuntu VM, install.sh

docs/guides/install-linux.md

Your own reverse proxy (Caddy, nginx)

docs/guides/reverse-proxy.md

Releases publish ghcr.io/adamrowles1996/vaultgate:<version> for linux/amd64 and linux/arm64, signed with Sigstore cosign and carrying an SBOM and a provenance attestation, plus vaultgate-<version>.tgz and its .sha256 for the script install.

Documentation

Document

What it is

docs/guides/

User guides: first run, connecting Claude, Claude Code, Codex and the Inspector, tools and scopes, self-hosted Bitwarden, backup, upgrading, security model, FAQ

docs/spec/

The normative specification, one file per concern

docs/PLAN.md

Milestones, exit criteria, risks

docs/THREAT_MODEL.md

Assets, attackers, mitigations, residual risks

docs/comparison.md

How vaultgate differs from the other Bitwarden MCP servers, with dated verification notes

docs/adoption.md

Listings, channels and app-store definitions, with the submission mechanics for each

server.json

The MCP Registry listing; how to publish it: docs/guides/publishing.md

docs/adr/

Architecture decision records

CONTRIBUTING.md

Development workflow and quality gates

SECURITY.md

Reporting vulnerabilities

Development

Requires Node 26 (see .nvmrc) and mise for the pinned external linters.

mise install         # actionlint, shellcheck, shfmt, hadolint, gitleaks, editorconfig-checker
npm ci
npm run dev          # runs src/main.ts directly with Node's type stripping
npm run quality      # format, every linter, types, dead code, file sizes, provenance, tests at 100%

Every check that runs in CI runs locally with npm run quality. See CONTRIBUTING.md for the rules the repository enforces and why.

Licence

Apache-2.0. See LICENSE and NOTICE.

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    MCP server for Vaultwarden/Bitwarden vault management. Enables AI agents to securely create, search, read, and update vault items via the official Bitwarden CLI, with safe-by-default redaction and support for both stdio and SSE transports.
    53
    609 npm
    17
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    MCP server that lets AI agents call APIs without ever seeing the credentials, using a local encrypted vault and per-secret allowlist policies for HTTP requests and subprocess environment variables.
    1
    AGPL 3.0
  • A
    license
    C
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    An MCP server that integrates 1Password with AI agents, providing secure access to vaults and items with secrets redacted by default.
    16
    18 npm
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    An MCP server for using Bitwarden Secrets Manager as durable credential storage for agent workflows, enabling secure secret storage, retrieval, and injection into trusted executables.
    7
    MIT