Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-azeth

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides trust and reputation tools for AI agent wallets within the x402 payment ecosystem and ERC-8004 agent registry. It enables users to perform wallet reputation lookups, real-time risk assessments, and browse registered agents.
      4
      342 npm
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides permissionless wallet infrastructure for AI agents to manage wallets, sign transactions, and handle tokens across Solana and all EVM-compatible chains. It includes 29 specialized tools for on-chain operations, featuring built-in security guards and automated x402 payment processing without KYC requirements.
      29
      1,388 npm
      3
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Trust infrastructure for AI agents on Base. DEX Spread Oracle (live Uniswap V3 prices), on-chain escrow, insurance pool, and collective knowledge base. 7 smart contracts. Pay-per-query via x402 micropayments in USDC.
      6
      -

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 36 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target a distinct resource-and-action combination, and the major domains (accounts, agreements, registry/reputation, messaging, guardian) are clearly separated. The only mild ambiguities are near-duplicate pairs like pay/smart_pay and update_service/update_service_batch, but their intended differences are explicit.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Names overwhelmingly follow azeth_<verb>_<noun> in snake_case, with get/list/create/update used predictably. A few outliers (azeth_accounts, azeth_balance, azeth_history, azeth_guardian_approve/status) break the strict verb-first pattern, but they are still readable and not chaotic.

    Tool Count2/5

    36 tools is a heavy surface for a single MCP server, well beyond the 25-tool threshold in the rubric. Several tools could be consolidated (agreement queries, service update vs batch update, whitelist token vs protocol, guardian approve/status), so the set feels bloated even though the underlying platform is broad.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolkit covers the full smart-account lifecycle, payment agreements, trust-registry/reputation, messaging, and guardian interactions with no dead-end workflows. Minor gaps remain—no service deregistration, no agreement amendment, and no guardrail-limit editing—but agents can accomplish the core platform tasks.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive