Skip to main content
Glama
ayushgundecha

codesentry-mcp

by ayushgundecha
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to codesentry-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Argus MCP

      lokafinnsw
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI-powered, zero-trust code review with multiple models, supporting single files, git diffs, and multiple files, with security, performance, and architecture checks across 10+ languages.
      13
      MIT

    • ward

      user31133
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      AI-powered code quality analysis that detects security issues, bugs, code smells, and performance problems across multiple languages.
      4
      -

    • SecureVibes MCP

      SimonvanAs
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI-powered security scanning of codebases through conversational analysis, allowing users to assess, threat model, code review, DAST test, and generate security reports using natural language with Claude.
      MIT

    • MCP Code Crosscheck

      olaservo
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables AI-assisted code review with bias mitigation strategies through cross-model evaluation and bias-aware prompting. Detects AI-generated code from commit authors and provides structured reviews with security, performance, and maintainability analysis.
      -

    • MCP Code Reviewer

      parthamehta123
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI-powered code review and improvement, including analysis, refactoring suggestions, and automatic test generation, with an optional agentic loop for iterative refinement.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools serve entirely different purposes: one checks connectivity and the other performs repository analysis. There is no overlap or ambiguity in their intended use.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Both tool names are imperative verbs, but 'ping' is a bare verb while 'analyze_repository' follows a verb_noun pattern. This is a minor deviation from a fully uniform naming convention.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only two tools, the server feels minimal. For a repository analysis service, one might expect additional tools for managing or retrieving results, but the count is not unreasonable for a simple utility.

    Completeness3/5

    The core analysis functionality is present, but there are no supporting operations such as listing previous analyses, fetching detailed reports, or configuring analysis parameters. The surface is functional but incomplete for a comprehensive analysis workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources